par Waylander » Jeu 04 Mar 2010, 17:24
Quelqu'un pourrait livre en anglais la partie "image" et me dire approximativement si ça veut dire qu'elle est op? Parce que je comprend qu'elle est nase en fait mais je peux me tromper. Et oui le 6/10 me fait peur. ya un 8 à cpoté je comprend pas trop.
Image: 6/8 NOTE: The below Blu-ray captures were taken directly from the Blu-ray disc.
The first number indicates a relative level of excellence compared to other Blu-ray video discs on a ten-point scale. The second number places this image along the full range of DVD and Blu-ray discs.
I found myself completely flummoxed by the image quality of this Blu-ray, even long before Max arrived at his magical island. I usually find some way to explain choices about lighting, filtration, lensing and art direction, but not here. I was never able to come to grips with the question of why the image is so unengaging. There is hardly a frame where I didn't question if there wasn't something amiss. Backlighting is very strong, and there is a resistance to fill lit, especially for Max, that struck me as downright pig-headed. Where we can see things "in the light" so to speak, there is a decided lack of detail and texture.
In the deep recesses of the forest, there is a kind of brightening that undoes the darkness. Grain is often present, but, again, I fail to see why it's there in the first place. Not only is the image is a gross contradistinction to Sendek's fine line drawings, it strikes me as unfantastical, and certainly unwhimsical. The creatures looked somewhat more precise than Max, which was just as troubling for me, as if they occupied two different universes – which in a way, I suppose they do – but somehow I couldn't make them converge.
Titre: Max et les Maximonstres (Where the wild things are)
donc en gros l'image est pas top alors (6/10) ?
